(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

RVing Here and There

Thoughts, news and information about the world as seen through RV windows
RSS icon Email icon Home icon
  • Naturehike Tents: Silent Wing vs Ultralight Cycling

    Posted on July 5th, 2017 admin No comments

    I wound up with two light-weight single-person tents:

    Both tents were supposedly available for under $100, though I ended up having to order the Silent Wing from another warehouse and paid about $110.

    Rather than list the specifications side by side, I’ll just give a quick comparison.

    Naturehike NH18A095-D without storm skirt

    Naturehike NH18A095-D without storm skirt

    Size

    The cycling tent is a little larger.  Its rectangular floorplan gives a little more room inside for a wider camper or a bit more gear.  The Silent Wing’s tapered footprint skimps on floor space but cuts down on weight.  Both tents have roughly equal height from floor to peak, but the crossed poles of the Silent Wing seem to give more headroom.  The cycling tent has an A-frame and when I sit up, the sides of the peak seem pretty close to my head.  Doesn’t really bother me, but the Wing definitely feels roomier up top.

    Silent Wing 1 by Korean manufacturer Naturehike

    Silent Wing 1 by Korean manufacturer Naturehike

    Gear Storage

    Both tents have a little (barely adequate) storage pocket; for the SW it’s in the roof, for the Cycling tent it’s by the door.  Both were handy to keep my glasses safe and out of the way.

    The narrow tapered design of the SW means there’s room in the tent for a sleeper and not much else.  I’m short and not too broad, so was able to stow a little gear at the head or foot and a little in the vestibule (boots and bar bag) but the panniers had to go outside under a little tarp.

    The rectangular orange cycling tent is far more roomy.  In the one heavy rain this tent was in, I was able to get all my gear under cover in the tent or under the vestibule without feeling crowded.  A taller, broader camper might not find it so roomy.

    Weatherproofing

    The two tents are similar in density, and waterproofing, with the SW being just a bit lighter fabric.

    I initially had a concern that rain would come in when the vestibule was open.  With the tents  oriented so the vestibule was 45 degrees to the prevailing wind, this turned out not to be a serious issue.  Sure, a little rain got in whenever I went in or out.  It wasn’t much.  Before my entry/exit I pushed the sleeping bag back so rain wouldn’t hit it.   Then I mopped up the moisture with my towel.  Let’s face it, by the time that storm was over, almost everything was a bit damp.

    There was a minor issue of water getting under the fly on the SW during one of two heavy extended rainstorms, but I fixed that by adjusting the fly.  Not the fault of the tent.  I think if I were to use this tent more I’d add another strap to peg the foot end of the fly further out from the tent.

    On the other hand, the storm flaps on the Cycling tent work really well at keeping out rain.  Combined with the A-frame structure, they’d also keep out snow, making this a possible three-season tent. Unfortunately, they also keep out air circulation, and the little triangular vent (similar in both tents) is not sufficient to keep moisture from building up inside the tent.  Condensation on the inside of the fly is common in all tents, but in the SW there is enough air circulation to cut down on condensation a bit.    Both tents were fine with one side of the vestibule left open.

    I used some glue-on Velcro dots to hold the storm flaps up when I want them up.  I can just detach them if I want them down. We’ll see if that vents a bit better.

    Conclusions

    I like them both.  The Silent Wing is a bit more technically advanced, is has less floor space but more headroom, and less room for gear storage.  It definitely makes some minor sacrifices to be light and compact.  The Cycling tent is roomier on the floor but has less headroom when I sit up.  The storm flaps may offer some weatherproofing but reduce ventilation.

    Since I will be doing more cycling than backpacking, I’m keeping the orange and will sell the blue.

  • Shopping for a Solar Cell Phone Charger

    Posted on July 4th, 2017 admin No comments

    When we went on a recent bike trip (I’m not sure if I should call it bikepacking or touring), my cell phone went dead.  The trip host had a little solar charger mounted on his gear that kept his phone going for the whole trip.  I decided that looked useful and went online to find one.

    I buy a lot of this kind of stuff at banggood.com, one of the many Chinese online stores.  The have an amazing number of such chargers.   A spreadsheet is a good way to handle product research.

    Item # Description Length Width Thick mAh Mass (g) Flashlight Notes Price Shipping
    1124246 Solar Waterproof Portable Charger Dual USB Battery Power Bank 16 6,5 1,5 8000 6 @ 1 mm square Charging Lights, Carabiner $21.64 Free
    1106656 Dual USB Solar External Power Bank Battery Charger Pack For iPhone 7 Plus Xiaomi Smartphone 12 7.5 2 8000 single LED charge indicator; no mounting method $18.94 Free
    1014154 Universal 8000mAh Battery Solar Outdoor Travel Charger Level Indicator DC 5V 2A Power Bank 14.4 7.4 1.8 8000 12 LED – 2.4W Charge lights. Handle at top to secure. Anti-water, anti-shock, dustproof . Many bad reviews (82% positive) $17.58 Free
    1116234 Solar Climbing Clasp External DuaL USB Charger Power Bank For iPhone 7 Xiaomi Samsung 16 7.5 1.5 8000 Single LED with diffuser Includes carabiner. Image shows it wet, implies waterproof $21.64 Free
    999107 Solar Charger 8000mAh Dual USB Port Power Indicator Light Power Bank for Cellphone 19.5 11.4 3.3 8000 260 Single LED Funny “handle” on top. HUGE unit. Anti-shock/drop/water/dust $23.27 Free
    1111247 8000mAh Solar Power Bank Dual USB Battery Charger Set For Mobile Phone 13.5 6.8 1.8 8000 Single LED with diffuser Compass caribiner and belt clip. $20.29 Free

    I had also checked these out at Atmosphere, where they cost $90 CAD and more.   This made the prices online look very attractive.

    http://www.noahscave.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Tollcuudda-Waterproof-10000Mah-Solar-Power-Bank-Solar-Charger-Dual-USB-Power-Bank-with-LED-Light-for.jpg-2.jpg

    A typical portable solar charger, $66 USD at Noahs Cave.com

    In the end, I decided to order from amazon.ca at $28, thinking that at least some of my money would stay in Canada.  The price was a little higher than at banggood for what appears to be an identical unit, but Amazon promised a 1-week delivery compared to the typical three weeks from bangood.com.

    Guess what:  the unit I ordered just shipped from China.  It will arrive in about three weeks.

  • Weekend Bike Tour Review

    Posted on June 18th, 2017 admin No comments

    Earlier, I posted a gear list for an upcoming overnight bike tour. The tour’s over and it was a good experience.

    Setting Out

    On day 1 we had sunshine but brisk NW winds, I think 30 kph.  This was a fine tailwind for the first leg of my run, 20 km from Leduc to Millet, to join the Circuit Cycle club for this Meetup.  From there, we — hosts and trip organizers/leaders Brian and Teresa, with riders Roger, Melissa, Tanya, I — set out about 10:30 and the first leg was south, so we had the wind at our back then.  On turning west, however, we started a long tough slog.  Tanya has medical issues so part-way along arranged for a ride to the campsite.  The rest of us ploughed on into the wind, followed by a few kilometers of gravel.

    On a 27 km test run on Friday, just after a brief but heavy rainstorm.

    On a 27 km test run on the Friday before the tour, taken just after a brief but heavy rainstorm.

    The wind had delayed us considerably, so some of us stopped on the side of the road for lunch.  The rest of the group caught up to us too soon, so I packed up hastily and we moved on into the wind.  Total distance from Millet to camp was 29 km.

    At the Camp

    Once at our destination, we set up our tents.  One interesting observation:  All the others faced the door of their tents towards the center of the clearing where the firepit was.  Without thinking, I angled my tent with the vent downwind and the door facing away from the campfire.  A bit odd, because the surrounding forest mostly protected us from the wind.

    We played Frisbee (using my cloth disc, which the others dubbed “the flying underwear”, and a couple of others), sat around the fire and schmoozed, played “What’s that Song” on Brian’s phone, and consumed a number of coolers and weiners which our hosts had thoughtfully stowed at the site in coolers the day before.

    A few people woke up cold at 5 am and started the fire for an early breakfast. I noticed that Melissa and I slept the latest, I’m guessing because we had the most experience with our gear.  But that’s just conjecture.  More about gear in a bit.

    Camped in the clearing.  My orange tent at left.

    Camped in the clearing. My orange tent at left.

    Heading Home

    Partly because of the possibility of storms in the afternoon, but I think also because several people were tired and wanted to get home, we changed our departure time from after lunch to ASAP.  The 5am risers were pretty much packed, so the rest of us decamped and we took off at  9:00 am.  The weather was cool and cloudy but the wind was light.   We took a different and much easier route home, 24 km to Millet.  Roger took a short cut to his home (his knee was hurting).

    Four of us returned to Circuit Cycle, then went to a local restaurant for a tasty Chinese buffet.   From there, I returned to Leduc, a trip which has previously taken 45 minutes.  I met a freshening headwind that dragged that 20 km trip out to 75 minutes (toting 15 kg of gear didn’t help, you bet!).   By the time I got home, I was one tired old dawg!

    Gear Analysis

    On the whole, I think I packed well, even though I appeared to be carrying more gear than the others.

    What I was glad I took

    • My crushable hat (I was the only one with a hat. Guess I’m weird.)
    • The “flying underwear”
    • the tent, sleeping bag and mat that I had purchased and pre-tested
    • a 710 mL sports drink that I bought in Millet, extended my water supply.

    What I will take for next trip

    • A moist microfiber facecloth in a ziplock bag to make for easier hand/face wash

    What I may not take on the next trip

    •  Deck of cards (heavy and maybe not needed?)
    • The cute little Light My Fire lunch set
    • So many spare clothes — could easily have aired and worn things again

    What I took and didn’t use

    • Binoculars
    • Tent footprint
    • Nylon tarp
    • Rope and parachute cords
    • Sleeping Bag Liner
    • Hydration pak — forgot to even fill it up, but would have needed more water if Brian & Teresa hadn’t brought coolers
    • Disposable razor

    Looking at that list, I think the first five are useful.  I could have left the footprint because I knew we’d be in a grassed area.  I’d have used the tarp and ropes for gear storage and to cover the tent entrance if rain had threatened.  In warmer or cooler weather, I’d want the liner. I’d have used the binocs had I been on my own, but pressure to keep up with the group made some stops shorter than I’d have liked.  And different destinations might make them good to have.

    What Worked and What Didn’t

    Being familiar with my gear, having tested it out in my back yard and at our acreage, was a big help

    The tent, pad, and sleeping bag all worked well.   I was snug and warm and comfortable all night (except 4:00 am when my prostate insisted I needed to get up  and go).   There was condensation in the tent but it was not too much problem as I left one vestibule door open, only waking up to close it halfway during a brief rain shower (love the rain on a tent!  Went right back to sleep).  I will make some mods to the tent to improve ventilation.  My gear under the vestible and inside the tent stayed dry.

    Organizing things in stuff sacks worked well.  Things didn’t shift around or get jumbled.  I knew where to look for things for the most part. The sacks do add a few grams of weight but I think it was worth it.

    Stowing snacks was okay if I stuck to side pockets and the handlebar bag. Putting my food in a big plastic shopping bag didn’t.  I’ll need a better system for stowing food.

    The little Trangia spirit stove worked well.  Water on, then go pack up.  Make coffee, make oatmeal, put bacon on to cook.  Finish oatmeal, eat bacon, use remaining warm water to clean up with toilet paper that then goes into the firepit (it would go into a bag to pack home otherwise).

    I was underhydrated on the way home, even though I drank two glasses of water at the cafe with lunch.

    In Review

    All in all, it was a good learning trip.  A big thank you to the organizers and to my fellow cyclists for fun and fellowship (and even if I’m quiet, I am still enjoying!)

    I’m all set to go on another self-supported tour.

    Further Reading

     

     

  • Google Adsense and My Blog

    Posted on June 16th, 2017 admin No comments

    This is in the LOL category.

    I have ads on my blog, arranged by Google Adsense.  When people visit my blog and click on one of the ads,  I make a little money.

    Google pays me when my ad income reaches $100 USD.

    The ads on my blog bring in roughly $2 a month.

    It will take 50 months, or over four years, to reach that total.  Whee!

    There is hope.  My best month, May 2012, hit $8.32.   On the other hand, there are many months with $0.02 or $0.04 to bring the average down. Fortunately, there are more months  with $1 or more than there are months less than $1, making the average $2.14/month.

    So maybe I’ll hit a payout by 2022!

     

  • Gearing Up for a Weekend Bike Tour

    Posted on June 15th, 2017 admin 3 comments

    My friend Brian at Circuit Cycle & Sports in Millet has organized a Meetup for a short overnight bike tour training ride.   We’ll be traveling about 27 km then staying overnight at his acreage.  It’s kind of “bike touring for absolute beginners” and it sounds like fun.  Although I’ve done backpacking, winter camping, and canoe camping (as well as car camping), I’ve never done this kind of cycling before.  I’m looking forward to it.

    Here’s a list of my gear and where/how it’s stowed.  Darren Alff, “The Bicycle Touring Pro“, says that a common beginner mistake is to pack too much.  I’m a beginner.  Am I carrying too much along?

    I’ve done a couple of “test runs” and have used all the equipment, so there shouldn’t be too many surprises.  Some items, such as the sleeping bag liner and clothing choices, may be omitted or changed at the last minute, depending on the weather, and I’ll probably be reorganizing during/after the ride.

    On the Rack

    Besides the rear panniers, my sleeping bag and tent are bungied to the rear rack.  Sleeping bag compression sack also contains the sleeping pad.

    20170615_124425

    Marmot Nanowave bag and compression bag, 1138 g; Therm-A-Rest Trail Scout and stuff sack, 636 g; both at Atmosphere. Naturehike tent from Banggood.com, 1586 g.  Footprint for tent, stowed elsewhere, 238 g.

    Rear Panniers

    These are Axiom 20L panniers from United Cycle.  They are joined so that with one handle you can grab them both.  I wasn’t sure they were big enough, but they turned out to be quite roomy and can hold all of what you see here with room for a little more.

    Right Rear Pannier:  Cooking & Stuff

    In the right rear “side pocket” are a steel mirror, some songbooks, a pannier cover, and that’s about it.  Maybe I’ll think of something to add later.

    The main right rear pouch contains cooking gear and some other stuff, organized in stuff sacks:

    Right pannier

    Right pannier

    Cooking gear and ... tent footprint

    Cooking gear and … tent footprint

    Stove and pot set

    Stove and pot set.  Trangia Mini, $45 from MEC: pot, frypan, methanol burner, pot handle

    Mess kit

    Lunch Kit by Light My Fire, in Sweden.  Lightweight, $25 at Atmosphere, but I have my doubts about its usefulness.

    Cooking stuff -- spatula, salt & pepper, instant coffee, spices, TP for cleanup, soap, etc.

    Cooking stuff — spatula, salt & pepper, instant coffee, spices, TP for cleanup, soap, etc.  Stuff I’ve had and used for years.

    Mug, utensils, & fuel bottle

    Mug & utensils I’ve used for years; Trangia fuel bottle, $22 Canadian Outdoor Equipment

    Rope & parachute cord. Not for cooking, but it happened to fit in that side nicely.

    Rope & parachute cord. Not for cooking, but it happened to fit in that side nicely.

    Some food.  It and some more will be stowed here and there.

    Some food. It and more will be stowed here and there.

    Left Pannier:  Clothes & Personal Stuff

    On the other side I’ve stowed clothes, toiletries, hat, games, and whatever.  Probably some food.  I’ve used stuff bags wherever possible for organizing my stuff <hehe>

    Left pannier

    Left pannier

     

    Hmm.  Hat, sleeping bag liner, frisby, toiletries kit, wrench, spare tube, CO2 inflator, clothing bag

    Hmm. Crushable hat, sleeping bag liner, folding frisbee, toiletries kit, wrench, spare tube, CO2 inflator, clothing bag.  First aid kit from outside pocket is bottom right.  Playing cards… where are the cards?

     

    First aid kit, courtesy of my wife the nurse. It's in the side pocket for quick access.

    First aid kit, courtesy of my wife the nurse, that we’ve used for years (updated annually)  It’s in the pannier side pocket for quick access.

     

    Spare clothing including dry pants, zip on bottoms for the shorts I'll be riding in, spare T, long-sleeved wool undershirt

    Spare clothing including dry pants, zip on bottoms for the shorts I’ll be riding in, spare T, long-sleeved wool undershirt

     

    Toiletries including camp towel

    Toiletries including camp towel, soap, etc.  Yes, I’m carrying that heavy electric toothbrush!

     

    Handlebar Bag

    Bought this bag from Circuit Cycle last week.  It opens from the front.  Why do they make them like that?  It would make much more sense to me to have it open from the bike side, where I’m sitting.

    Handlebar bag

    Handlebar bag.  Jacket not shown.

     

    Inside the handlebar bag: binoculars, reflective vest, sunglasses, riding/camp gloves, TP & Kleenex, headlamp, carry strap. Missing: jacket

    Inside the handlebar bag: binoculars, reflective vest, sunglasses, riding/camp gloves, TP & Kleenex, headlamp, carry strap.

    Oops, forgot these were in the side pocket: lip balm, bug repellent

    Oops, forgot these were in the side pockets:   lip balm, bug repellent

     

    What’s it Weigh?

    I’m still moving things and have the food to stow, but for now, here’s how things measure up:

    • Sleeping bag, sleeping pad, compression sacks: 1.8 kg (3.1 lb)
    • Tent & Bungies: 1.7 kg (3.5 lb)
    • Panniers: 6.1 kg (about 13.5 lb)
    • Front Bag: 1.8 kg (about 3.7 lb)

    I also plan to carry my hydration pack with 2L of water and maybe some other bits of gear, plus two 750 ml water bottles for another 1.5L of water.  The mass of 3.5 L of water can be taken as 3.5 kg (love the metric system!) or about 7.7 lb; call it 4 kg or about 8.8 lb.

    So I’ll be toting roughly 11 kg (24 lb) without including water, 15 kg or about 33 lbs including water.

    I haven’t bothered to list the clothes I’m wearing.  Nor did I think to include things in my pockets,  etc. that will go into a bag somewhere.  Those items include a light wallet with credit card, drivers’ licence, Alberta Health card, and a little money; a small Swiss Army knife, a comb,  Sugoi cycling jacket, light raincoat.  They’ll add some mass too.

    Did I get it all?

    Please comment below if you notice something missing!  Or if you see something in the list that I could do without.

     

  • Naturehike Silent Wing One-Person Tent

    Posted on June 14th, 2017 admin No comments

    I wanted a tent for short-distance bike touring and maybe some overnight backpacking. I didn’t need expensive top-end gear for occasional and casual use.  I researched NatureHike and found their products well-reviewed, and in the end wound up with two of their tents for under $200 combined.

    Specs and First Impressions

    This tent, the Naturehike Silent Wing 1,  is promoted on GearBest.com for $69.73 CAD plus $8.74 S/H.   Unfortunately, it’s out of stock at that price.  When I got it, it cost me C$105.12 with shipping.  There was no extra duty or tax.  I thought that even this was a reasonable price for the tent.

    It’s a bit more technical than the Naturehike Cycling tent I previously reviewed (a comparison is elsewhere).  Here are the specs, according to GearBest and Naturehike:

    • GearBest product number 487874
    • Tent inside material: 150D oxford cloth; waterproof index: more than 3000mm
    • Tent outside material: 210T plaid; waterproof index: more than 3000mm
    • Tent pole material: 7001 high strength aluminum pole
    • Footprint material (Wind Wing 1): 150D polyester oxford cloth
    • Rainproof, waterproof and windproof, three seasons design
    • 1 person tent size : 225 x 95 x 110cm / 88.58 x 37.4 x 43.31 inches
    • Product weight: 1.705 kg
    • Package weight: 1.730 kg
    • Package Size(L x W x H): 45.00 x 15.00 x 15.00 cm / 17.72 x 5.91 x 5.91 inches

    Silent Wing Close

    Package Contents

    The tent came from GearBest with the following:

    • 1 x Tent
    • 1 x Fly Sheet
    • 1 x Cinch strap
    • 8 x Aluminum Y-profile Pegs with storage sack
    • 4 x Guy lines
    • 1 x Set of Aluminum poles with storage sack
    • 1 x Storage Bag for all of the above
    • 1 x Wind Wing 1 footprint (fits the Silent Wing) with storage bag

    The tent itself, with bag, poles, pegs, guys, and fly, weighed 1554 grams; the footprint and bag were 162 g; total mass 1716 grams or 1.716 kg, very close to the stated mass (this is not always the case).

    Wind-Wing 1 by Korean manufacturer Naturehike

    Wind-Wing 1 / Silent Wing 1 by Korean manufacturer Naturehike

     

    Silent Wing vs Wind Wing

    Wind Wing Mat

    Silent Wing 1 tent with Wind Wing 1 mat (footprint)

    The Silent Wing is not even listed on the Naturehike web site.  The current model is the Wind Wing, which based on the specs at Naturehike is more waterproof (4000 mm vs 3000 mm), with reduced weight (1360 g).  In terms of layout and design, the two tents appear to be highly similar, to the point where a Wind Wing mat was included with the Silent Wing tent.

    Impressions:  The Good

    There are some technical features I like that remind me of higher-level tents such as those by MSR; I find these atrractive in a product at this price point.

    •  The crossed-pole design gives lots of headroom and a feeling of spaciousness inside.
    • It has a tapered floor, wide at the head end and narrowing to the foot.  This cuts down on mass, but also reduces floor space.  Don’t plan to take much gear inside, especially if you’re tall or broad.
    • There is a well-fitted, full-cover fly without a storm skirt.  Some people fear that this design can allow wind and rain to blow into the tent, although with other tents of similar design I have not found this to be an issue.
    • All guys and tethers are 1 mm cord, with lightweight plastic locks on the guys.
    • There are reflective strips on the fly clips — they show up quite brightly in a flashlight beam so you don’t trip on them in the dark
    • The stuff sack is roomy and I have never had trouble packing up the tent, even wet.
    • The aluminum pegs are y-beam, similar to MSR (Mountain Safety Research) Mini-Groundhog stakes.
    • The tent ground attachments are  strap-and-cord, a few grams lighter than plain straps, but still with grommets for the poles.  Compare the MSR method which puts the pole into a small tab attached to the cord and shaves off a few more grams per attachment.
    Red poles to the gold grommet (top), grey poles to the silver grommet (bottom)

    Strap-and-string.  Red poles to the gold grommet (top), grey poles to the silver grommet (bottom), peg thru the string

    Impressions:  The Bad

    I do have some reservations about the design.

    • Better quality tents generally have a ridge-pole across the top that extends the fly over the door.  This little roof peak provides additional headroom and helps keep rain out of the tent when the vestibule is open.
    • The vestibule is quite small.  There’s not a lot of room for gear storage there.

    The Silent Wing appears to be an earlier version of the Wind Wing, and I expect the latter to have some changes/improvements to reduce the mass even further.  Perhaps the grommets are red, for better color matching with the poles.

    Tapered footprint cuts down weight, but reduces floor space

    Tapered footprint cuts down weight, but reduces floor space

    Impressions:  The Ugly

    It’s not something I’d considered before, because my previous tent had a front entry.   The Silent Wing is a left-handed tent.  When you are inside, looking out the door, you are laying on your right side.  Your left hand is free, so that is the easiest one to use to unzip the door.  I’m right-handed, so this is just a bit awkward.    I can push myself up with my left hand and open the door with my right.  Not impossible, just awkward.

    My sleeping bag has a left-hand zipper.  When I am lying on my back, the zipper is on my left side.  It’s never bothered me before. I turn that way and undo the zipper with my right hand.  But in this tent, the zipper is on the side away from the door; unzipping the bag puts me with my back to the door so I have to undo the bag further and roll over to access the door.  Not impossible, just awkward.  A sleeping bag with a right-hand zipper would make this easier…but am I prepared to buy another sleeping bag just to make the tent easier?

    Conclusion

    My first impression is favorable.  This light-weight Naturehike Silent Wing tent appears to be well-made and quite suitable for bicycle touring and backpacking or to toss under the back seat of the pickup for emergency use.  I expect that it would wear well and last several seasons of occasional, casual use. The greatest drawbacks are the small vestibule and a fly designed to let rain in when you enter or exit the tent. And the awkwardness of the left/right thing.   We’ll see if actual use confirms the first impression.

    Read More

  • Naturehike Ultralight Cycling Tent: Life Inside

    Posted on June 14th, 2017 admin No comments

     

    Naturehike Cycling Silicone Ultralight One Man Tent

    I’ve had this entry-level backpacking/cycling tent for a month and have used it several times.  When first I received it, I reviewed the specifications and gave my first impressions.  Then, I reviewed the ease (or not) of setup and takedown.    Now it’s time for a quick review of life under the flysheet, actually using the tent.  I have spent five nights in this tent so far, enough time go know the pros and cons.

    Two Versions:  Plain and Storm Skirt

    There are two versions of the fly sheet.  The first one is a normal “full-cover” fly, as shown below. This version allows air to flow from the bottom of the fly up and out through the vent.

    Naturehike NH18A095-D without storm skirt

    Naturehike NH18A095-D without storm skirt

    The second version of the fly has a storm skirt, also known as storm flaps or snow flaps.  This is the version I received from Bangood.com.

    Set up in my back yard for first impressions

    Set up in my back yard for first impressions, showing the storm skirt

    Con:  Ventilation Limited; Tiny Vestibule

     Ventilation is minimal in this tent, limited to a little triangular aperture above the head end.

    One one occasion, I set up during a warm evening as a thunderstorm was coming in. The air temperature dropped while I was putting up the tent on wet grass, and immediately there was condensation under the fly. The storm hit and I ducked inside and closed the vestibule. With me inside, water was running down the fly (but fortunately, not dripping into the tent). A couple of hours after I went to sleep, I woke up hot and sweaty — the tent was like a sauna, warm and damp.

    I hauled my gear inside the tent, undid the vestibule, stretched the left panel as far to the right across the tent door as I could, to try to minimize the rain coming into the tent,  and went back to sleep in my damp bag.   Aside from what came in through the door, there was no water inside the tent.

    Fortunately, the next day was sunny and I was able to dry everything out.

     

    Pro:  Relatively Roomy

    I’ve already discussed ease of setup, ability to put up the fly first then add the tent underneath (I did this in a dry run, but fortunately, I haven’t had to do this yet in a storm), and some other features.  During use, I found another advantage to this tent.

    During the storm, I took my gear (two 20L panniers and my shoes) out from under the vestibule into the tent with me — fortunately there’s enough room.  I’m a short guy (5’7″, 170 cm), not too big (155 lb, 70 kg) and I find this tent roomy.  On my last trip, I had two 20L panniers and a front bag, plus my shoes, in the tent with me.  I can put them at the head or foot of the tent, or range them in a row beside me in any combination, and still not press too badly on the sides of the tent.  A taller, bulkier traveler will have enough floor space for comfort, but might not have room for gear.

    Of course, I’d much rather those things didn’t share my tent, and there’s just barely enough from for them in the vestibule.  There’d probably be enough room there for a small backpack.   But it’s marketed as a cycling tent.

    In the meantime, I picked up a lightweight nylon tarp to use as to extend the vestibule, to give more room for gear and so I can enter and exit the tent in a storm without letting in too much rain.  We’ll see how that works out.

    Conclusion: Decent Tent

    I’m quite satisfied with this tent, given its $75 CAD pricelist (shipping included).   The tent is lightweight, compact, reasonably well-made, and serves its purpose as an entry-level one-person tent for occasional use. Its major flaw is that there is no “roof peak” over the entry, so rain can come right into the tent if the vestibule is open or as you enter/exit the tent.  Naturehike has other lightweight 1-man and 2-man tents that do not have these restrictions.

    The tent is available at Banggood as I write this.

    Disclaimer:  I am not connected with either Banggood or Naturehike and I have received no compensation or incentive for this review.

    Further Reading on Naturehike Lightweight Cycling Tent

     

  • Cycling Red Deer to Lacombe and Back

    Posted on May 29th, 2017 admin No comments

    One Saturday, as part of a Meetup bike trip, I rode the Trans Canada Trail from Red Deer to Lacombe and back, roughly 55-60 km.  The trip was a training ride for the Leduc-Camrose MSBike, one of many such events to raise money for MS research.

    It was the longest ride I’ve done so far — and I survived!

    We Meet Near Cronquist House

    We — Susan, Mesut, and me — started at historical Cronquist House beside Bower Ponds in the Red Deer River valley.

    From https://www.ehcanadatravel.com/gallery/index/category/1891-bower_ponds_park

    Cronquist House:  From https://www.ehcanadatravel.com/gallery/index/category/1891-bower_ponds_park

     

    The ponds themselves are a delightful park, and I had come half an hour early to bike around the ponds and to wait for the others in the group.  Bower Ponds Map

    We took off on time at 10:00 am, and stopped briefly for photos at the Trans Canada Trail Pavillion, which is just a bit south and east around the first pond.CTC Pavillion

    CTC Pavillion Close

    Mesut and Susan

    After our photo stop, we rode out for the long uphill that is Taylor Drive.  The ride through the city is not bad, a wide paved route though residential, green, and industrial areas.  There was a 20 kph headwind to cope with, but it mostly just kept us cool.

    At the northern end of Red Deer, the trail moves onto the old CE Trail.  We biked around a bit before reconfirming that our route was straight across the highway.  The Calgary-Edmonton Trail is a paved but shoulderless rural road that  I enjoyed thoroughly.  This scenic route passes through fields and forests, past ponds and acreages; there was little traffic, flat travel, and open vistas.

    Blindman River Bridge

    We had one little blip at the end of the CE Trail, when a traffic sign read “No Exit, Subdivisions Only”.  There really should have been a TCT sign on that post!  Fortunately, both the TCT app on my phone and my travelling companions (who had done the route before) said that was the way to go.  Sure enough, there was a little footbridge at the end to get us across the Blindman River.   Fran, the fourth member of the group, met us there.

    Photo by Mesut

    Fran, Tom, Susan.  Photo by Mesut, obviously.

     

    Blackfalds and Abbey Centre

    The four of us set out for Blackfalds, where the trail took us through some residential areas and eventually to the Abbey Centre, a 41,000 sq. ft. recreation complex.  The Trans-Canada Trail runs right through the building.  I think we entered at the treed area in the upper left as shown in the photo below, rode a ways, then came down a flight of stairs to emerge in the parking lot, lower left.

    Photo by Town of Blackfalds

    Photo by Town of Blackfalds

    We didn’t take much time to explore the fitness centre, but did pause to have our photo taken by the big trail sign:

    Photo by Fran M.

    Susan, Tom, Mesut, Fran.  Photo by Fran M, courtesy of a passerby.

    A brief pitstop at the centre’s washrooms, followed by a quick (and slightly confused) circumnavigation of the Centre saw us en route for Lacombe.   This stretch of trail, the County of Lacombe Trail, was another wonderful and scenic stretch that meandered through fields and forests and took us past the Lacombe Agricultural Research Station into the city.

    Tom on a stretch of the Lacombe County Trail.  Photo by Fran

    Tom on a stretch of the Lacombe County Trail. Photo by Fran.  Shows you what wonderful weather we had.

    Lunch at Ugly’s Pub & Grill

    Fran led us downtown, to Ugly’s Pub and Grill for lunch, at about 12:20 (a little later than estimated.  Oh, well).

    Ugly's Pub & Grill

    Here we are, all filled up with beverages and pub grub:

    Lunch at Ugly's

     

    And Back to Red Deer

    After that, there was nothing to do but go home.   The trip back always seems shorter, and this time we had the wind mostly at our back.  Even so, some of the little hills just south of Lacombe seemed pretty nasty to tired legs, and at least one cyclist walked a bit (not saying, but not me).

    We stopped at a picnic area just northwest of the Blindman bridge for a rest break and to say ‘bye to Fran.  Then back along the CE Trail, as pretty coming as it was going.   Finally, we finished with the long downhill on Taylor Drive, varied with a little hop across the road on a pedestrian bridge and straight down into Bower Ponds, a more direct route than we took on the way out.

    Who, Me, Tired?

    I had had a big beer and a big glass of water at lunch, and still by the time I reached the Lions Campground, some 6 km downstream, I had sucked my water bottle dry.  I guess that where the group did roughly 55 km, I must have added another 12+,  which is almost the distance I have to ride for MS Bike from Leduc to Camrose next month.    A little nap after supper, followed by two rum-and-Cokes and a lot of peanuts and potato chips (must have been short of salt!  Next time I’ll remember to have a sports drink) and I was fine.

    So what did I do the next day?  After my meetings at the Kerry Wood Nature Centre, I went for another hour and a half bike ride.  But that’s another story.

     

  • Americans Scientific Illiterates?

    Posted on May 23rd, 2017 admin No comments

    “Though the discourse of science is metric,” writes Elizabeth Kolbert in a note to her book, The Sixth Extinction, “most Americans think in terms of miles, acres, and degrees Fahrenheit.  All the figures in this book are given in Englisn [Imperial] units…”

    This unfortunate observation implies several things:

    America is Scientifically Illiterate

    First, the average American is scientifically illiterate.  A scientific paper that mentions centimetres, or joules, or kilograms is incomprehensible.  A hectare  is meaningless.  Symbols like  kPa or kWh might as well be hieroglyphics.   Even my spell-checker, set to American English, marks “centimetres”  — the official Système International spelling — as incorrect; it expects “centimeters”.  Americans don’t even spell like the rest of the world, let alone speak the language of international science.

    America Gets the Kindergarten Version

    Second, reporting or explaining scientific terms or achievements or research to Americans thus requires an additional layer of translation or simplification.  To Americans, even more than to citizens of other countries, science is a foreign language, as incomprehensible as French or German (as when they write Voilà! as Wallah! or zaftig as softig).   This puts them at a distinct disadvantage in trying to comprehend the modern world: they can only grasp the kindergarten version, the watered-down summary, the oversimplification.

    How Many Pounds in 328.7 Kilograms?

    Third, it leaves average America open to errors of conversion, mistakes in translation.  Many examples of conversion error disasters exist; some of them are no doubt apocryphal, others are apparently well-documented.  Such famous errors have cost the US millions, perhaps billions of dollars, as well as lost time and international embarrassment.

    • 1998, a joint NASA/ ESA project, the Solar Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) lost all communication with Earth.  A conversion algorithm from English to metric units had been omitted from some of the control files.
    • 1999, the Institute for Safe Medication Practices reported a case where a patient received 0.5 g (grams) of the sedative Phenobarbital; the prescription was for 0.5 gr (grains; a gram is about 15 grains). Medication errors cause at least one death every day and injure approximately 1.3 million people annually in the United States, says the FDA.  How many of those errors are due to misreading of units?
    • 1999, NASA lost the Mars Climate Orbiter ($125 M) after a 286-day trip to Mars.  Miscalculations due to the use of English units instead of metric sent the craft slowly off course.
    • 2004, Tokyo Disneyland — The Space Mountain ride was derailed due to a broken axle.  The axle was the wrong size, due to a conversion from English to metric units
    • Probably hundreds of minor errors go unreported each year.

    Doesn't Use the Metric System

    You Have to Wonder Why

    One has to wonder why America ties itself so firmly to a version of the Imperial system.  After all, they fought a revolution to be free from England.  Why cling so tightly to the past?

    As early as 1866, metric measures were legal in the USA, with various acts and agreements passed during the succeeding century and a half (see 150 Years of Legal Metric Usage in the USA for the sorry history) yet today even Britain is more thoroughly metric than  America, according to that article.  The USA is woefully behind the times and most other countries, choosing alchemy over science, the past over the present, the antique over the modern.

    Okay, it’s not quite that bad, and America has managed to become a world leader in science and technology despite their handicaps.  Their trade deficit, on the other hand…

     

  • NatureHike Ultralight Tent: Set-up and Take-Down

    Posted on May 16th, 2017 admin No comments

     

    Set-up and Take-down of the Naturehike Cycling Silicone Ultralight One Man Tent

     

    • BanggoodProduct ID: 1020476
    • Color: Orange
    • Brand: Naturehike
    • https://www.naturehike.com/cycling-ultralight-silicone-one-man-tent/
    • Model: NH18A095-D Cycling Silicone Ultralight One Man Tent

    Good First Impression

     

    I bought this tent for occasional casual use in backpacking and bike touring.  It made a good first impression: compact, light, well-made, and well-presented. All the parts were there, including a footprint; pegs, poles, and footprint came in their own storage bags; everything fit nicely into the tent storage bag. Fit and finish were decent. Time to set it up.

    The tent and footprint before first opening

    The tent and footprint before first opening

    Steps to Set Up the NatureHike

     

    Setup was quick and easy.   A waterproof Ikea-style picture instruction sheet is sewn into the tent bag so it can’t be lost. It’s typical pole-in-grommet setup, with clips for the fly, similar to most tents I’ve used over the past two decades.

    If you jam the poles into the ground and throw on the fly, you can in fact then add the footprint and tent afterwards, out of the rain. Might cover that in a future post. However, the normal setup is:

    1. Remove items from the storage bag and lay them out in a convenient order. In windy weather, place pegs and poles on top of tent and fly so nothing blows away (you hope)

      Everything set out and ready to go.

      Everything set out and ready to go.

    2. If using the footprint — advised for rocky or rough terrain — lay it out and peg it down square, with one corner facing the prevailing wind. Is there a right way up for the footprint? Yes: the little buckles should point up. Put the rest of the pegs and their storage bag into the main bag so they don’t get lost or blow away.

      Footprint staked down

      Footprint staked down

    3. Spread the tent out. Note the orientation of the door; your head will be to the right as you look at the door from the outside. You want the door at a 45 degree angle to the prevailing wind. Peg the tent down square.

      Tent spread out and pegged down

      Tent spread out and pegged down

    4. If you have the footprint down, slip out the pegs one at a time and add the tent strap, then reinsert the peg.

      Tent and footprint pegged together

      Tent and footprint pegged together

    5. Remove the poles and put the pole bag into the main bag so it doesn’t blow away (by habit, I stow everything in the tent from this point on). Open the poles. The longer part, with four sections, will go to the right as you face the door. Insert the poles into the grommets in the straps. If you have the footprint down, put the pole through both grommets.

    6. Clip the tent to the poles, using the attached hooks.Tent hooked to pole

    7. Open the fly sheet, orient it so that the vestibule is over the door and put it over the poles and tent.. Move around to the back of the tent, flip up the fly, and tie the three straps to the central pole. Use slip knots (like tying a shoe lace) so you can undo them easily later. Why do this from the back? Because if you’re oriented to the prevailing wind, you can hang on to the fly sheet more easily (the voice of experience!).  These ties make the fly and frame a more integrated unit, so that the wind guys are attached to the frame (poles) not just to the fly.

      The the fly to the poles

      Tie the fly to the poles

    8. Clip each corner of the fly sheet into the buckle. Don’t tighten the fly straps just yet.

    9. Stretch out the vestibule and peg it down.

      Stretch out the vestibule and stake it down

      Staking the vestibule

    10. Go around to the back side, stretch out the fly sheet using the attached strap, and peg it down.

      Stake the fly at the back

      Stake the fly at the back

    11. Now go to each corner and stretch the fly straps so that the fly is properly centered over the poles. You may need to readjust this in rain as the nylon fly will stretch a bit. Don’t forget to relax the straps as the fly dries out.

    12. Add the guy lines if heavy weather is expected. Or just to be safe.

      Guy line added at head end

      Guy line added at head end

    I am able to set up this tent by myself in just over five minutes in calm conditions. It takes a little longer with a strong wind (I didn’t time it, because I needed to concentrate on getting it up and getting my gear stowed).

     

    Taking Down and Packing Up the Silicone Ultralight

     

    Take-down in dry, calm conditions was simple and took only a few minutes. In windy conditions, folding the tent and fly was a bit of a fight. Fortunately, there’s lots of room in the tent bag so I didn’t have to be terribly precise about folding; everything went in fine. I was able to fold the tent fairly dry under the fly in the rain, so that only the footprint and fly went in wet. I was able to dry everything out and repack it with no harm.

     

    Notes and Observations

     

    • This is a free-standing tent, which means that if you need to you can unpeg it, and move it to a new location or better orient it to the weather. It also means you can tip it onto its side to dry the bottom off before packing up.

    • The fly on my particular model has what NatureHike calls a skirt, little flaps that spread on the ground on each side. I know them as storm flaps or snow flaps, and the tent is steeply pitched enough that it might withstand snow. In the winter, shovel snow onto the skirt; in summer, pile rocks or sand or sticks on the flaps to keep the wind out in heavy weather. Not sure there’s enough ventilation, though — we’ll see. There is a little triangular vent at the head end.

      Vent propped open

      Vent propped open

    • The vestibule is tiny, barely enough room for shoes in the corner and a small pannier on either side. The rectangular floor inside is fairly large, room enough for me and gear.

      Vestibule with a couple of Axiom panniers.  Crawl over them to enter tent.

      Vestibule with a couple of Axiom panniers. Crawl over them to enter tent.

    • The pointy top means tight head room when you’re kneeling or sitting cross-legged. Other designs give a greater feeling of space even with smaller floor plans. I didn’t find this too bothersome since I’m mostly sprawled out when I’m in a tent, or propped up by my pack.

    • The tent has a hook at top for a light, and a small gear pocket at the head end by the door.

    • Some of the stitching is off-center, and might eventually have to be redone, but all look reasonably secure. I expect at least a summer of use without problems.

    • The Velcro fasteners on the vestibule do not look firmly sewn. We’ll see how they hold up

     

    Further Reading

Supporting your fulltime RV adventures and aspirations